Washington, DC, has long operated under a different set of economic conditions than most American cities. With the federal government as its anchor employer and a dense ecosystem of contractors, consultants, and nonprofits built around it, the region has historically been insulated from the kinds of labor market shocks that rattle other areas of the country.
But a confluence of forces—including the lingering effects of the remote work revolution, return-to-office mandates for federal workers, and an aggressive downsizing of the federal workforce—is now testing that insulation in ways the data are starting to capture.
This election year, the incoming mayor and council will need to understand the effects of these trends if they want to solidify and expand the DC region’s economy.
The timing matters enormously. The incoming policymakers will inherit an economy in transition, and the choices they make will shape DC’s fiscal health for years to come. When office buildings sit empty, when fewer workers commute into the District, and when federal employment shrinks, DC’s tax revenue base—sales, property, and others—feels the pressure directly. Understanding the data behind these trends and how to address them is good economic policy and answers questions about how the District pays for public services like police, health care, and schools.
1. DC’s remote work persists despite a national decline
The share of people working remotely in the DC area has fallen substantially from its pandemic-era peak, when nearly half (around 48 percent) of employees worked remotely. The most recent estimates from the American Community Survey put the share of people who live in DC working remotely at about 23 percent.
This is still well above both its prepandemic level of around 5 percent and the current national average of 14.6 percent. The trend reflects both private-sector employers pulling workers back to the office and, more recently, the federal government’s sweeping return-to-office requirements.
Source: American Community Survey.
Notes: American Community Survey = ACS. The ACS question asks, “How did this person usually get to work LAST WEEK? Mark (X) ONE box for the method of transportation used for most of the distance.” The remote work option is framed as “Worked from home.”
DC’s remote-work rate remains elevated because of the nature of the region’s workforce (PDF)—heavy in policy professionals and desk-based federal employees. Even as the pendulum swings back toward in-person work, DC will likely have more remote workers than most of the country. And this pattern has far-reaching implications for commercial real estate prices, which ultimately directly flows to the District in the form of property taxes.
According to CBRE data, DC’s commercial vacancy rate now exceeds 22 percent, up from 14 percent at the end of 2019. The good news is that the rate appears to have stabilized since the third quarter of 2024, suggesting demand may be finding a floor. A near-complete halt in new office construction has helped contain supply. A development pipeline that once exceeded 7 million square feet in 2018 has been reduced to 0 as of early 2026. With no new supply coming online, the existing vacancy surplus could gradually stabilize if demand holds at current levels or edges upward chip away at vacancies even in an environment with soft demand.
The bigger question is what happens to this demand going forward. If federal employment continues to decline and remote work remains elevated, the office market will face persistent pressures regardless of supply. Like challenges with the residential housing market—affordable housing, zoning rules and regulations, and changes in the District’s rental laws—local policymakers, business leaders, and builders should consider whether business-oriented policies, like property tax abatement for commercial properties, job creation grants, or small business development grants will help address them.
2. Metro ridership is recovering, but the prepandemic baseline remains out of reach
After years of postpandemic depression, daily rail ridership has been trending upward over the past year—a reflection of both organic return-to-office behavior and the mandate-driven reappearance of federal workers on the system. For the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), which has struggled financially throughout the remote-work era, this trend might offer some relief.
Still, as of this year, daily weekday ridership is at about 80 percent of pre-pandemic levels; weekend ridership, however, continues to grow and so far this year, is about 30 percent higher than it was in early 2019. In general, post-pandemic WMATA ridership recovery is on par or greater than many metro systems in other large cities.
Notes: The blue line is the average monthly morning rush ridership totals (not including holidays and weekends) from people entering the system outside DC and exiting inside DC; black lines are the annual averages.
That gap represents not just a transit funding challenge but a broader signal that the DC region’s weekday commuting economy has not fully snapped back. This could mean restaurants, retail, and service businesses are still operating with significantly lower foot traffic during the week than in 2019. Recent estimates from the DC Office of the Chief Financial Officer show the effects, finding that inflation-adjusted restaurant sales tax collections fell by 3.6 percent between 2019 and 2025.
WMATA’s fiscal situation has greatly improved in the past few postpandemic years, and the fiscal year 2027 budget (which starts July 1, 2026) has grown substantially to $4.8 billion for both capital and operating expenses. The agency relies on riders’ fares, but also heavily relies on subsidies from the three jurisdictions it serves. Looking ahead, leaders in the region are exploring ways to “advance funding solutions” to support WMATA in all three jurisdictions, including annual funding commitments indexed to grow over time and flexibility for each jurisdiction to select its own funding mechanism.
3. Federal workforce cuts are hitting the employment market hard
Perhaps the most striking development in the DC labor market over the past year is the scale of job loss. Between January 2025 and January 2026, total nonfarm employment in DC fell by nearly 6 percent—a decline that stands out sharply against the broader national picture, where it rose by 0.2 percent. The driver is not hard to identify: Federal government employment dropped significantly, a direct consequence of the administration’s efforts to move certain agency headquarters outside the District and reduce the overall size of the federal workforce.
Across DC’s major industry sectors, almost none have escaped contraction. The only bright spots are narrow ones: Employment in the mining, logging, and construction sector is up about 2 percent (though that sector employs only around 14,000 workers in the region, making its contribution to total employment modest), and the health care and social assistance sector eked out 0.5 percent growth, a reminder that demand-driven sectors tied to an aging population are somewhat insulated from policy-driven workforce changes. Everything else has contracted.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics. Values are seasonally adjusted.
Continuing changes in the federal government and related sectors, coupled with potentially dramatic changes in the labor market stemming from technological changes like artificial intelligence, are going to be crucial issues for policymakers and business leaders to address in the coming months. On the employee side, this could mean expanded training, retraining, apprenticeship and job placement programs; on the employer side, it may require rethinking the development incentives and tax packages used to attract and retain businesses (e.g., child care facilities) within the District.
The bottom line
DC’s labor market appears to be navigating a structural shift, not just a cyclical bump. Remote work has come down from its peak but remains elevated. Transit ridership is recovering but hasn’t fully returned. Job losses tied to federal workforce reductions are real and broad-based. And the commercial real estate market, while stabilizing, reflects a city that still has significant excess capacity to absorb.
For policymakers, employers, and anyone watching the region’s economic trajectory, the data suggest a metro area in transition—one that retains real strengths in its workforce and institutions but faces a more uncertain near-term outlook than it has in decades, which will require creative solutions.
Let’s help communities build more secure, hopeful futures.
Today’s complex challenges demand smarter solutions. Urban brings decades of expertise to understanding the forces shaping people’s lives and the systems that support them. With rigorous analysis and hands-on guidance, we help leaders across the country design, test, and scale solutions that build pathways for greater opportunity.
Your support makes this possible.
